Protokol Opsional Konvensi Menentang Penyiksaan

Protokol Opsional Konvensi Menentang Penyiksaan
Nama panjang:
  • Protokol Opsional Konvensi Menentang Penyiksaan dan Perlakuan atau Hukuman Lain yang Kejam, Tidak Manusiawi, dan Merendahkan Martabat Manusia
JenisKonvensi HAM
Dirancang18 Desember 2002[1]
Ditandatangani18 Desember 2002
LokasiNew York
Efektif22 Juni 2006[1]
Syarat20 ratifikasi[2]
Penanda tangan75[1]
Pihak88[1]
PenyimpanSekjen PBB[3]
BahasaArab, Tionghoa, Inggris, Prancis, Rusia dan Spanyol[4]

Protokol Opsional Konvensi Menentang Penyiksaan dan Perlakuan atau Hukuman Lain yang Kejam, Tidak Manusiawi, dan Merendahkan Martabat Manusia (umum disebut sebagai Protokol Opsional Konvensi Menentang Penyiksaan) adalah sebuah perjanjian yang menjadi pelengkap bagi Konvensi Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa Menentang Penyiksaan. Perjanjian tersebut mendirikan sistem inspeksi internasional untuk tempat-tempat penahanan yang didasarkan pada sistem yang telah ada di Eropa sejak 1987.

Referensi

  1. ^ a b c d Kesalahan pengutipan: Tag <ref> tidak sah; tidak ditemukan teks untuk ref bernama untc
  2. ^ OPCAT Diarsipkan 2008-05-05 di Wayback Machine., Article 28. Retrieved on 30 December 2008.
  3. ^ OPCAT Diarsipkan 2008-05-05 di Wayback Machine., Article 27. Retrieved on 30 December 2008.
  4. ^ OPCAT Diarsipkan 2008-05-05 di Wayback Machine., Article 37. Retrieved on 30 December 2008.

Pranala luar

  • Text of the protocol — Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
  • List of parties Diarsipkan 2013-02-13 di Wayback Machine.
  • Association for the Prevention of Torture
  • The Center for Victims of Torture
  • l
  • b
  • s
Instrumen hak asasi manusia internasional
Deklarasi, manifesto, dan resolusi
Perjanjian hukum internasional
Perjanjian regional
Putusan pengadilan
  • Handyside v. United Kingdom (1976)
  • Lovelace v. Canada (1981)
  • Young, James & Webster v. United Kingdom (1981)
  • Guerrero v. Colombia (1982)
  • Baboeram-Adhin v, Suriname (1985)
  • Velásquez-Rodríguez v. Honduras (1988)
  • Müller v. Switzerland (1988)
  • Kitok v. Sweden (1988)
  • K. v. Austria (1990)
  • Lubicon Lake Band v. Canada (1990)
  • Toonen v. Australia (1992)
  • Castells v. Spain (1992)
  • Open Door and Dublin Well Woman v. Ireland (1992)
  • Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria (1994)
  • McCann v. United Kingdom (1995)
  • Goodwin v. United Kingdom (1996)
  • Kelly v. United Kingdom (1997)
  • Osman v. United Kingdom (1998)
  • Güleç v. Turkey (1998)
  • Amnesty International v. Zambia (1999)
  • Avocats Sans Frontières v. Burundi (2000)
  • Forum of Conscience v. Sierra Leone (2000)
  • Union Nationale des Syndicate Autonomes du Senegal v. Senegal (2000)
  • Barrios Altos v. Peru (2001)
  • VgT v. Switzerland (2001)
  • Lawyers for Human Rights v. Swaziland (2002)
  • Pretty v. United Kingdom (2002)
  • SERAC v. Nigeria (2002)
  • Law Office of Ghazi Suleiman v. Sudan (2003)
  • Interights et al. v. Botswana (2003)
  • Centre for Minority Rights Development et al. v. Kenya (2003)
  • Purohit and Moore v. The Gambia (2003)
  • Curtis Francis Doebbler v. Sudan (2003)
  • Association Pour la Sauvegarde de la Paix au Burundi v. Tanzania and Others (2003)
  • Dem. Rep. Congo v. Burundi and Others (2003)
  • Krone Verlag v. Austria (2003)
  • Garaudy v. France (2003)
  • Broniowski v. Poland (2004)
  • Öneryıldız v. Turkey (2004)
  • Editions Plon (Societe) v. France (2004)
  • Chauvy v. France (2004)
  • Selisto v Finland (2004)
  • Von Hannover v. Germany (2004)
  • K.L. v. Peru (2005)
  • Almonacid-Arellano v. Chile (2006)
  • Open Society Justice Initiative v. Cameroon (2006)
  • Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum v. Zimbabwe (2006)
  • Yildirim v. Austria (2007)
  • Behrami v. France (2007)
  • Rumpf v. Germany (2010)
  • A, B and C v. Ireland (2010)
  • Singh v. France (2011)
  • Gelman v. Uruguay (2011)
  • Interights v. Egypt (2011)
  • Association “21 December 1989” and Others v. Romania (2011)
  • Vejdeland v. Sweden (2012)
  • Sarayaku v. Ecuador (2012)
  • Länsman v. Finland (2013)
  • Câmpeanu v. Romania (2014)
  • Umuhoza v. Rwanda (2017)
  • E.S. v. Austria (2018)
  • M'Bala M'Bala v. France (2019)
  • Magyar Jeti Zrt v. Hungary (2019)
  • Konaté v. Burkina Faso (2020)
  • Rashkin v. Russia (2020)
  • Lilliendahl v. Iceland (2020)
  • Lhaka Honhat v. Argentina (2020)