Konvensi Internasional Tentang Perlindungan Seluruh Hak Buruh Migran dan Para Anggota Keluarga Mereka

Partai-partai negara dan penandatangan traktat tersebut:
  Menandatangani dan meratifikasi
  Menerapkan atau mensukseskan
  Hanya menandatangani

Konvensi Internasional Tentang Perlindungan Seluruh Hak Buruh Migran dan Para Anggota Keluarga Mereka adalah sebuah traktat multilateral yang memerintahkan perlindungan buruh migran dan keluarganya. Ditandatangani pada 18 December 1990, konvensi tersebut diterapkan pada 1 Juli 2003 setelah jumlah negara yang meratifikasi mencapai 20 negara pada Maret 2003. Komite terhadap Buruh Migran memantau penerapan konvensi tersebut, dan merupakan salah satu dari tujuh badan traktat hak asasi manusia terkait PBB.

Konteks

Pada 2005, jumlah migran internasional berjumlah antara 185 dan 192 juta. Jumlah ini mewakili sekitar tiga persen penduduk dunia, berbanding dengan populasi Brasil. Hampir seluruh negara mengalami migrasi, entah itu mengirim, transit, atau datang ke negara-negara, atau kombinasi dari ketiganya. Migrasi internasional menjadi fitur intrinsik dari globalisasi.

Negara ratifikasi dan penandatangan

Pada Mei 2015, 28 negara berikut ini meratifikasi Konvensi tersebut: Albania, Argentina, Aljazair, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Belize, Bolivia, Bosnia dan Herzegovina, Burkina Faso, Tanjung Verde, Chili, Kolombia, Timor Leste, Ekuador, Mesir, El Salvador, Ghana, Guatemala, Guyana, Guinea, Honduras, Indonesia, Jamaika, Kirgizstan, Lesotho, Libya, Madagaskar, Mali, Mauritania, Meksiko, Maroko, Mozambik, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Paraguay, Peru, Filipina, Rwanda, Senegal, Seychelles, Sri Lanka, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriah, Tajikistan, Turki, Uganda dan Uruguay.

Pranala luar

  • Full text of the Convention (English)
  • Full text of the Convention (Spanish)
  • Signatures and ratifications Diarsipkan 2013-11-03 di Wayback Machine.
  • The Committee on Migrant Workers (which monitors the implementation of the convention Diarsipkan 2009-01-19 di Wayback Machine.
  • The 2002 International Migration Report published by the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs/Population Division
  • Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Migrants
  • UNESCO Programme on International Migration and Multicultural Policies: Project on the UN Convention on Migrants’ Rights
  • International Labour Organization
  • International Organization for Migration
  • Migrants Rights International
  • Migrant Forum in Asia
  • December 18 Diarsipkan 2010-02-11 di Wayback Machine.
  • l
  • b
  • s
Instrumen hak asasi manusia internasional
Deklarasi, manifesto, dan resolusi
Perjanjian hukum internasional
Perjanjian regional
Putusan pengadilan
  • Handyside v. United Kingdom (1976)
  • Lovelace v. Canada (1981)
  • Young, James & Webster v. United Kingdom (1981)
  • Guerrero v. Colombia (1982)
  • Baboeram-Adhin v, Suriname (1985)
  • Velásquez-Rodríguez v. Honduras (1988)
  • Müller v. Switzerland (1988)
  • Kitok v. Sweden (1988)
  • K. v. Austria (1990)
  • Lubicon Lake Band v. Canada (1990)
  • Toonen v. Australia (1992)
  • Castells v. Spain (1992)
  • Open Door and Dublin Well Woman v. Ireland (1992)
  • Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria (1994)
  • McCann v. United Kingdom (1995)
  • Goodwin v. United Kingdom (1996)
  • Kelly v. United Kingdom (1997)
  • Osman v. United Kingdom (1998)
  • Güleç v. Turkey (1998)
  • Amnesty International v. Zambia (1999)
  • Avocats Sans Frontières v. Burundi (2000)
  • Forum of Conscience v. Sierra Leone (2000)
  • Union Nationale des Syndicate Autonomes du Senegal v. Senegal (2000)
  • Barrios Altos v. Peru (2001)
  • VgT v. Switzerland (2001)
  • Lawyers for Human Rights v. Swaziland (2002)
  • Pretty v. United Kingdom (2002)
  • SERAC v. Nigeria (2002)
  • Law Office of Ghazi Suleiman v. Sudan (2003)
  • Interights et al. v. Botswana (2003)
  • Centre for Minority Rights Development et al. v. Kenya (2003)
  • Purohit and Moore v. The Gambia (2003)
  • Curtis Francis Doebbler v. Sudan (2003)
  • Association Pour la Sauvegarde de la Paix au Burundi v. Tanzania and Others (2003)
  • Dem. Rep. Congo v. Burundi and Others (2003)
  • Krone Verlag v. Austria (2003)
  • Garaudy v. France (2003)
  • Broniowski v. Poland (2004)
  • Öneryıldız v. Turkey (2004)
  • Editions Plon (Societe) v. France (2004)
  • Chauvy v. France (2004)
  • Selisto v Finland (2004)
  • Von Hannover v. Germany (2004)
  • K.L. v. Peru (2005)
  • Almonacid-Arellano v. Chile (2006)
  • Open Society Justice Initiative v. Cameroon (2006)
  • Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum v. Zimbabwe (2006)
  • Yildirim v. Austria (2007)
  • Behrami v. France (2007)
  • Rumpf v. Germany (2010)
  • A, B and C v. Ireland (2010)
  • Singh v. France (2011)
  • Gelman v. Uruguay (2011)
  • Interights v. Egypt (2011)
  • Association “21 December 1989” and Others v. Romania (2011)
  • Vejdeland v. Sweden (2012)
  • Sarayaku v. Ecuador (2012)
  • Länsman v. Finland (2013)
  • Câmpeanu v. Romania (2014)
  • Umuhoza v. Rwanda (2017)
  • E.S. v. Austria (2018)
  • M'Bala M'Bala v. France (2019)
  • Magyar Jeti Zrt v. Hungary (2019)
  • Konaté v. Burkina Faso (2020)
  • Rashkin v. Russia (2020)
  • Lilliendahl v. Iceland (2020)
  • Lhaka Honhat v. Argentina (2020)