Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.

1940 United States Supreme Court case
Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.
Argued February 8–9, 1940
Decided March 25, 1940
Full case nameSheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.
Citations309 U.S. 390 (more)
60 S. Ct. 681; 84 L. Ed. 825
Holding
In the case of an unauthorized adaptation, courts may elect to award only a portion of an infringer's profits to the plaintiff. The proportion that the defendant is entitled to keep is in proportion to the amount of original creative work went into the adaptation, and the court may be assisted in determining that by expert witness testimony.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Charles E. Hughes
Associate Justices
James C. McReynolds · Harlan F. Stone
Owen Roberts · Hugo Black
Stanley F. Reed · Felix Frankfurter
William O. Douglas · Frank Murphy
Case opinion
MajorityHughes, joined by unanimous
McReynolds took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp., 309 U.S. 390 (1940), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held, in the case of an unauthorized adaptation, courts may elect to award only a portion of an infringer's profits to the plaintiff. The proportion that the defendant is entitled to keep is in proportion to the amount of original creative work that went into the adaptation, and the court may be assisted in determining that by expert witness testimony. The Court found that awarding more to the plaintiff "would be to inflict an unauthorized penalty."[1]

The case involved Metro-Goldwyn using material from the 1930 play Dishonored Lady by Edward Sheldon and Margaret Ayer Barnes for the 1932 film Letty Lynton. It was brought before various courts[2][3] before ending up with the Supreme Court, which awarded one fifth of the profits.[4]

References

  1. ^ Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp., 309 U.S. 390 (1940).
  2. ^ "Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corporation, 106 F.2d 45 (2d Cir. 1939)". Justia U.S. Law. Justia. Retrieved August 21, 2022.
  3. ^ "Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corporation, 26 F.Supp. 134 (S.D.N.Y. 1938)". Justia Law. Retrieved January 20, 2019.
  4. ^ "Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp. (1940) - 309 U.S. 390, 60 S. Ct. 681 (1940)". LexisNexis.

External links

  • Text of Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp., 309 U.S. 390 (1940) is available from: CourtListener  Justia  Library of Congress 
  • v
  • t
  • e
U.S. Supreme Court Article I case law
Enumeration Clause of Section II
Qualifications Clauses of Sections II and III
Elections Clause of Section IV
Origination Clause of Section VII
Presentment Clause of Section VII
Commerce Clause of Section VIII
Dormant Commerce Clause
Others
Coinage Clause of Section VIII
Legal Tender Cases
Copyright Act of 1790
Patent Act of 1793
Patent infringement case law
Patentability case law
Copyright Act of 1831
Copyright Act of 1870
Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890
International Copyright Act of 1891
Copyright Act of 1909
Patent misuse case law
Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914
Lanham Act
Copyright Act of 1976
Other copyright cases
Other patent cases
Other trademark cases
Habeas corpus Suspension Clause of Section IX
No Bills of Attainder or Ex post facto Laws Clause of Section IX
Contract Clause of Section X
Legal Tender Cases
Others
Compact Clause of Section X


Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

  • v
  • t
  • e