Resolutions concerning death penalty at the United Nations

United Nations General Assembly resolution adopted in 2007

United Nations resolution approved in 2007
104 voted for
  • 54 voted against
  • 29 abstained
  • ResultApproved
    United Nations resolution approved in 2008
    UN General Assembly
    Resolution 63/168
    Date18 December 2008
    Meeting no.70
    CodeA/RES/63/168 (Document)
    SubjectMoratorium on the use of the death penalty
    Voting summary
    • 106 voted for
    • 46 voted against
    • 34 abstained
    ResultApproved
    United Nations resolution approved in 2010
    UN General Assembly
    Resolution 65/206
    Date21 December 2010
    Meeting no.71
    CodeA/RES/65/206 (Document)
    SubjectMoratorium on the use of the death penalty
    Voting summary
    • 109 voted for
    • 41 voted against
    • 35 abstained
    ResultApproved
    Result of the 2008 General Assembly vote.
      In favour (106)
      Against (46)
      Abstained (34)

    At Italy's instigation, a resolution for a moratorium on the death penalty was presented by the European Union in partnership with eight co-author member States to the General Assembly of the United Nations, calling for general suspension (not abolition) of capital punishment throughout the world. It was twice affirmed: first, on 15 November 2007 by the Third Committee, and then subsequently reaffirmed on 18 December by the United Nations General Assembly resolution 62/149. New Zealand played a central role facilitating agreement between the co-author group and other supporters.

    It calls on States that maintain the death penalty to establish a moratorium on the use of the death penalty with a view to abolition, and in the meantime, to restrict the number of offences which it punishes and to respect the rights of those on death row. It also calls on States that have abolished the death penalty not to reintroduce it. Like all General Assembly resolutions, it is not binding on any state.

    On 18 December 2007, the United Nations General Assembly voted 104 to 54 in favour of resolution A/RES/62/149, which proclaims a global moratorium on the death penalty, with 29 abstentions (as well as 5 absent at the time of the vote).[1] Italy had proposed and sponsored this resolution. After the resolution's approval, Italian Foreign Minister Massimo D'Alema declared: "Now we must start working on the abolition of the death penalty".[2]

    On 18 December 2008, the General Assembly adopted another resolution (A/RES/63/168) reaffirming its previous call for a global moratorium on capital punishment 106 to 46 (with 34 abstentions and another 6 were absent at the time of the vote). Working in partnership with the EU, New Zealand and Mexico were co-facilitators of the draft text which was developed over a period of six months, which Chile then presented to the UN General Assembly on behalf of cosponsors.

    On 21 December 2010, the 65th General Assembly adopted a third resolution (A/RES/65/206) with 109 countries voting in favour, 41 against and 35 abstentions (another seven countries were absent at the time of the vote).[3]

    On 20 December 2012, the 67th General Assembly adopted a fourth resolution (A/RES/67/176) with 111 countries voting in favour, 41 against and 34 abstentions (another seven countries were absent).[4]

    On 18 December 2014, the 69th General Assembly adopted a fifth resolution (A/RES/69/186) with 117 countries voting in favour, 38 against and 34 abstentions (another four countries were absent).[5]

    On 19 December 2016, the 71st General Assembly adopted a sixth resolution (A/RES/71/187) with 117 countries voting in favour, 40 against and 31 abstentions (another five countries were absent).[6]

    On 16 December 2018, 121 voted in favour of the 7th resolution, 35 against, and 32 abstained.[7]

    On 16 December 2020, 123 voted in favour of the 8th resolution, 38 against, and 24 abstained.[8]

    On 15 December 2022, 125 voted in favour of the 9th resolution, 37 against, 22 abstained, and 9 absent.[9]

    International campaign

    Hands Off Cain

    Logo of the organisation "Hands Off Cain"

    The UN moratorium campaign was launched in Italy by the association Hands Off Cain, affiliated to the Nonviolent Radical Party.[10] The association against death penalty and torture was founded in Rome in 1993 by former left-wing terrorist and current nonviolent politician and human rights activist Sergio D'Elia, with his first wife Mariateresa Di Lascia and Italian Radicals' liberal leaders Marco Pannella and Emma Bonino (former European Commissioner).

    History

    In 1994, a resolution for a moratorium was presented for the first time at the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) by the Italian government. It lost by eight votes. Since 1997, through Italy's initiative, and since 1999 through the EU's endeavour, the United Nations Commission on Human Rights (UNCHR) has been approving a resolution calling for a moratorium on executions with a view to completely abolishing the death penalty, every year. The 2007 vote at the Third Committee of the United Nations General Assembly saw intense diplomatic activity in favour of the moratorium by EU countries, and by the Nonviolent Radical Party itself; the Catholic Community of Sant'Egidio joined forces by submitting to the U.N. an appeal and 5,000,000 signatures asking for the moratorium to be passed.[citation needed].

    Full text of resolution 62/149

    The General Assembly,

    Guided by the purposes and principles contained in the Charter of the United Nations,

    Recalling the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,[a] the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights[b] and the Convention on the Rights of the Child,[c]

    Recalling also the resolutions on the question of the death penalty adopted over the past decade by the Commission on Human Rights in all consecutive sessions, the last being its resolution 2005/59 of 20 April 2005,[d] in which the Commission called upon states that still maintain the death penalty to abolish it completely and, in the meantime, to establish a moratorium on executions,

    Recalling further the important results accomplished by the former Commission of Human Rights on the question of the death penalty, and envisaging that the Human Rights Council could continue to work on this issue,

    Considering that the use of the death penalty undermines human dignity, and convinced that a moratorium on the use of the death penalty contributes to the enhancement and progressive development of Human Rights, that there is no conclusive evidence that the death penalty's deterrent value and that any miscarriage or failure of justice in the death penalty's implementation is irreversible and irreparable,

    Welcoming the decisions taken by an increasing number of States to apply a moratorium on executions, followed in many cases by the abolition of the death penalty,

    1. Expresses its deep concern about the continued application of the death penalty;
    2. Calls upon all States that still maintain the death penalty to:
      1. Respect international standards that provide safeguards guaranteeing the protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty, in particular the minimum standards, as set out in the annexe to Economic and Social Council resolution 1984/50 of 25 May 1984;
      2. Provide the Secretary-General with information relating to the use of Capital Punishment and the observance of the safeguards guaranteeing the protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty;
      3. Progressively restrict the use of the death penalty and reduce the number of offences for which it may be imposed;
      4. Establish a moratorium on executions with a view to abolishing the death penalty;
    3. Calls upon States which have abolished the death penalty not to reintroduce it;
    4. Requests the Secretary-General to report to the General Assembly at its sixty-third session on the implementation of the present resolution;
    5. Decides to continue consideration of the matter at its sixty-third session under the same agenda item.
    1. ^ Resolution 217 A (III).
    2. ^ Resolution 2200 A (XXI), annex.
    3. ^ United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1577, No. 27531.
    4. ^ Official Records of the Economic and Social Council, 2005, Supplement No. 3 and corrigenda (E/2005/23 and Corr.1 and 2), chap. II, sect. A.

    Full text of resolution 63/168

    The General Assembly,

    Reaffirming its resolution 62/149 of 18 December 2007 on a moratorium on the use of the death penalty,

    Welcoming the decisions taken by an increasing number of States to apply a moratorium on executions and the global trend towards the abolition of the death penalty,

    1. Welcomes the report of the Secretary-General on the implementation of resolution 62/149,[a] and the conclusions and recommendations contained therein;
    2. Requests the Secretary-General to provide a report on progress made in the implementation of resolution 62/149 and the present resolution, for consideration during its sixty-fifth session, and calls upon Member States to provide the Secretary-General with information in this regard;
    3. Decides to continue consideration of the matter at its sixty-fifth session under the item entitled "Promotion and protection of human rights".
    1. ^ A/63/293 and Corr. 1.

    Full text of resolution 65/206

    The General Assembly,

    Guided by the purposes and principles contained in the Charter of the United Nations,

    Recalling the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,[a] the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights[b] and the Convention on the Rights of the Child,[c]

    Reaffirming its resolutions 62/149 of 18 December 2007 and 63/168 of 18 December 2008 on the question of a moratorium on the use of the death penalty, in which the General Assembly called upon States that still maintain the death penalty to establish a moratorium on executions with a view to abolishing it,

    Mindful that any miscarriage or failure of justice in the implementation of the death penalty is irreversible and irreparable,

    Convinced that a moratorium on the use of the death penalty contributes to respect for human dignity and to the enhancement and progressive development of human rights, and considering that there is no conclusive evidence of the deterrent value of the death penalty,

    Noting ongoing national debates and regional initiatives on the death penalty, as well as the readiness of an increasing number of Member States to make available information on the use of the death penalty,

    Noting also the technical cooperation among Member States in relation to moratoriums on the death penalty,

    1. Welcomes the report of the Secretary-General on the implementation of resolution 63/168[d] and the recommendations contained therein;
    2. Also welcomes the steps taken by some countries to reduce the number of offences for which the death penalty may be imposed and the decisions made by an increasing number of States to apply a moratorium on executions, followed in many cases by the abolition of the death penalty;
    3. Calls upon all States:
      1. To respect international standards that provide safeguards guaranteeing protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty, in particular the minimum standards, as set out in the annex to Economic and Social Council resolution 1984/50 of 25 May 1984, as well as to provide the Secretary-General with information in this regard;
      2. To make available relevant information with regard to their use of the death penalty, which can contribute to possible informed and transparent national debates;
      3. To progressively restrict the use of the death penalty and to reduce the number of offences for which it may be imposed;
      4. To establish a moratorium on executions with a view to abolishing the death penalty;
    4. Calls upon States which have abolished the death penalty not to reintroduce it, and encourages them to share their experience in this regard;
    5. Requests the Secretary-General to report to the General Assembly at its sixty-seventh session on the implementation of the present resolution;
    6. Decides to continue its consideration of the matter at its sixty-seventh session under the item entitled "Promotion and protection of human rights".
    1. ^ Resolution 217 A (III).
    2. ^ Resolution 2200 A (XXI), annex.
    3. ^ United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1577, No. 27531.
    4. ^ A/65/280 and Corr. 1.

    Voting record

    In favour (104)
    Abstaining (29) Against (54) Absent (5)
     Albania
     Algeria
     Andorra
     Angola
     Argentina
     Armenia
     Australia
     Austria
     Azerbaijan
     Belgium
     Benin
     Bolivia
     Bosnia and Herzegovina
     Brazil
     Bulgaria
     Burkina Faso
     Burundi
     Cambodia
     Canada
     Cape Verde
     Chile
     Colombia
     Congo
     Costa Rica
     Cote D'Ivoire
     Croatia
     Cyprus
     Czech Republic
     Denmark
     Dominican Republic
     Ecuador
     El Salvador
     Estonia
     Finland
     France
     Gabon
     Georgia
     Germany
     Greece
     Guatemala
     Haiti
     Honduras
     Hungary
     Iceland
     Ireland
     Israel
     Italy
     Kazakhstan
     Kiribati
     Kyrgyzstan
     Latvia
     Liechtenstein
     Lithuania
     Luxembourg
     Madagascar
     Mali
     Malta
     Marshall Islands
     Mauritius
     Mexico
     Micronesia (Federated States of)
     Monaco
     Montenegro
     Mozambique
     Namibia
     Nauru
       Nepal
     Netherlands
     New Zealand
     Nicaragua
     Norway
     Palau
     Panama
     Paraguay
     Philippines
     Poland
     Portugal
     Republic of Moldova
     Romania
     Russian Federation
     Rwanda
     Samoa
     San Marino
     Sao Tome and Principe
     Serbia
     Slovakia
     Slovenia
     South Africa
     Spain
     Sri Lanka
     Sweden
      Switzerland
     Tajikistan
     The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
     Timor-Leste
     Turkey
     Turkmenistan
     Tuvalu
     Ukraine
     United Kingdom
     Uruguay
     Uzbekistan
     Vanuatu
     Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
     Belarus
     Bhutan
     Cameroon
     Central African Republic
     Cuba
     Democratic Republic of the Congo
     Djibouti
     Equatorial Guinea
     Eritrea
     Fiji
     Gambia
     Ghana
     Guinea
     Kenya
     Lao People's Democratic Republic
     Lebanon
     Lesotho
     Liberia
     Malawi
     Morocco
     Niger
    Republic of Korea
     Sierra Leone
     Swaziland
     Togo
     United Arab Emirates
     United Republic of Tanzania
     Viet Nam
     Zambia
     Afghanistan
     Antigua and Barbuda
     Bahamas
     Bahrain
     Bangladesh
     Barbados
     Belize
     Botswana
     Brunei Darussalam
     Chad
     China
     Comoros
    Democratic People's Republic of Korea
     Dominica
     Egypt
     Ethiopia
     Grenada
     Guyana
     India
     Indonesia
     Iran (Islamic Republic of)
     Iraq
     Jamaica
     Japan
     Jordan
     Kuwait
     Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
     Malaysia
     Maldives
     Mauritania
     Mongolia
     Myanmar
     Nigeria
     Oman
     Pakistan
     Papua New Guinea
     Qatar
     Saint Kitts and Nevis
     Saint Lucia
     Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
     Saudi Arabia
     Singapore
     Solomon Islands
     Somalia
     Sudan
     Suriname
     Syrian Arab Republic
     Thailand
     Tonga
     Trinidad and Tobago
     Uganda
     United States of America
     Yemen
     Zimbabwe
     Guinea-Bissau
     Peru
     Senegal
     Seychelles
     Tunisia
    Observer States:  Holy See
    In favour (106)
    Abstaining (34) Against (46) Absent (6)
     Albania
     Algeria
     Andorra
     Angola
     Argentina
     Armenia
     Australia
     Austria
     Azerbaijan
     Belgium
     Benin
     Bolivia
     Bosnia and Herzegovina
     Brazil
     Bulgaria
     Burkina Faso
     Burundi
     Cambodia
     Canada
     Cape Verde
     Chile
     Colombia
     Congo
     Costa Rica
     Cote D'Ivoire
     Croatia
     Cyprus
     Czech Republic
     Denmark
     Dominican Republic
     Ecuador
     El Salvador
     Estonia
     Ethiopia
     Finland
     France
     Gabon
     Georgia
     Germany
     Greece
     Guinea-Bissau
     Haiti
     Honduras
     Hungary
     Iceland
     Ireland
     Israel
     Italy
     Kazakhstan
     Kyrgyzstan
     Latvia
     Liechtenstein
     Lithuania
     Luxembourg
     Madagascar
     Mali
     Malta
     Marshall Islands
     Mauritius
     Mexico
     Micronesia (Federated States of)
     Monaco
     Montenegro
     Mozambique
     Namibia
     Nauru
       Nepal
     Netherlands
     New Zealand
     Nicaragua
     Norway
     Palau
     Panama
     Paraguay
     Peru
     Philippines
     Poland
     Portugal
     Republic of Moldova
     Romania
     Russian Federation
     Rwanda
     Samoa
     San Marino
     Sao Tome and Principe
     Serbia
     Slovakia
     Slovenia
     Somalia
     South Africa
     Spain
     Sri Lanka
     Sweden
      Switzerland
     Tajikistan
     The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
     Timor-Leste
     Turkey
     Turkmenistan
     Tuvalu
     Ukraine
     United Kingdom
     Uruguay
     Uzbekistan
     Vanuatu
     Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
     Bahrain
     Belarus
     Bhutan
     Cameroon
     Central African Republic
     Cuba
     Djibouti
     Eritrea
     Fiji
     Gambia
     Ghana
     Guatemala
     Guinea
     Jordan
     Kenya
     Lao People's Democratic Republic
     Lebanon
     Lesotho
     Liberia
     Malawi
     Mauritania
     Morocco
     Niger
     Oman
     Papua New Guinea
    Republic of Korea
     Senegal
     Sierra Leone
     Suriname
     Togo
     United Arab Emirates
     United Republic of Tanzania
     Viet Nam
     Zambia
     Afghanistan
     Antigua and Barbuda
     Bahamas
     Bangladesh
     Barbados
     Belize
     Botswana
     Brunei Darussalam
     China
     Comoros
    Democratic People's Republic of Korea
     Dominica
     Egypt
     Grenada
     Guyana
     India
     Indonesia
     Iran (Islamic Republic of)
     Iraq
     Jamaica
     Japan
     Kuwait
     Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
     Malaysia
     Maldives
     Mongolia
     Myanmar
     Nigeria
     Pakistan
     Qatar
     Saint Kitts and Nevis
     Saint Lucia
     Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
     Saudi Arabia
     Singapore
     Solomon Islands
     Sudan
     Swaziland
     Syrian Arab Republic
     Thailand
     Tonga
     Trinidad and Tobago
     Uganda
     United States of America
     Yemen
     Zimbabwe
     Chad
     Democratic Republic of the Congo
     Equatorial Guinea
     Kiribati
     Seychelles
     Tunisia
    Observer States:  Holy See
    In favour (109)
    Abstaining (35) Against (41) Absent (7)
     Albania
     Algeria
     Andorra
     Angola
     Argentina
     Armenia
     Australia
     Austria
     Azerbaijan
     Belgium
     Bhutan
     Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
     Bosnia and Herzegovina
     Brazil
     Bulgaria
     Burkina Faso
     Burundi
     Cambodia
     Canada
     Cape Verde
     Chile
     Colombia
     Congo
     Costa Rica
     Croatia
     Cyprus
     Czech Republic
     Denmark
     Dominican Republic
     Ecuador
     El Salvador
     Estonia
     Finland
     France
     Gabon
     Gambia
     Georgia
     Germany
     Greece
     Guatemala
     Guinea-Bissau
     Haiti
     Honduras
     Hungary
     Iceland
     Ireland
     Israel
     Italy
     Kazakhstan
     Kiribati
     Kyrgyzstan
     Latvia
     Liechtenstein
     Lithuania
     Luxembourg
     Madagascar
     Maldives
     Mali
     Malta
     Marshall Islands
     Mexico
     Micronesia (Federated States of)
     Monaco
     Mongolia
     Montenegro
     Mozambique
     Namibia
     Nauru
       Nepal
     Netherlands
     New Zealand
     Nicaragua
     Norway
     Palau
     Panama
     Paraguay
     Peru
     Philippines
     Poland
     Portugal
     Republic of Moldova
     Romania
     Russian Federation
     Rwanda
     Samoa
     San Marino
     Sao Tome and Principe
     Serbia
     Slovakia
     Slovenia
     Somalia
     South Africa
     Spain
     Sri Lanka
     Sweden
      Switzerland
     Tajikistan
     The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
     Timor-Leste
     Togo
     Turkey
     Turkmenistan
     Tuvalu
     Ukraine
     United Kingdom
     Uruguay
     Uzbekistan
     Vanuatu
     Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
     Bahrain
     Belarus
     Cameroon
     Central African Republic
     Comoros
     Cuba
     Democratic Republic of the Congo
     Djibouti
     Dominica
     Eritrea
     Fiji
     Ghana
     Guinea
     Jordan
     Kenya
     Lao People's Democratic Republic
     Lebanon
     Lesotho
     Liberia
     Malawi
     Mauritania
     Morocco
     Niger
     Nigeria
     Oman
    Republic of Korea
     Senegal
     Sierra Leone
     Solomon Islands
     Suriname
     Thailand
     United Arab Emirates
     United Republic of Tanzania
     Viet Nam
     Zambia
     Afghanistan
     Antigua and Barbuda
     Bahamas
     Bangladesh
     Barbados
     Belize
     Botswana
     Brunei Darussalam
     China
    Democratic People's Republic of Korea
     Egypt
     Ethiopia
     Grenada
     Guyana
     India
     Indonesia
     Iran (Islamic Republic of)
     Iraq
     Jamaica
     Japan
     Kuwait
     Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
     Malaysia
     Myanmar
     Pakistan
     Papua New Guinea
     Qatar
     Saint Kitts and Nevis
     Saint Lucia
     Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
     Saudi Arabia
     Singapore
     Sudan
     Swaziland
     Tonga
     Trinidad and Tobago
     Uganda
     United States of America
     Yemen
     Zimbabwe
     Benin
     Chad
     Cote D'Ivoire
     Equatorial Guinea
     Mauritius
     Seychelles
     Tunisia
    Observer States:  Holy See

    See also

    Notes

    1. ^ "General Assembly Adopts Landmark Text Calling for Moratorium on Death Penalty". United Nations. Archived from the original on 21 December 2007.
    2. ^ "Pena di morte, sì dell'Onu alla moratoria proposta dall'Italia" [Death penalty: yes from UN to Italy's proposed moratorium]. La Repubblica (in Italian). Retrieved 20 January 2020.
    3. ^ "New Resolution Approved by the UN. The Pro Moratorium Front Grows". Hands Off Cain. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 20 January 2020.
    4. ^ "World's nations call for executions freeze". World Coalition. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
    5. ^ "117 countries vote for a global moratorium on executions". World Coalition. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
    6. ^ "The UN General Assembly voted overwhelmingly for a 6th resolution calling for a universal moratorium on executions". World Coalition. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
    7. ^ "Death penalty: Global abolition closer than ever as record number of countries vote to end executions". WCADP. 16 December 2018. Retrieved 11 October 2021.
    8. ^ "Statement on the Adoption of the 8th UN General Assembly Resolution for a Moratorium on the Use of the Death Penalty". WCADP. 17 December 2020. Retrieved 11 October 2021.
    9. ^ "9th Resolution for a moratorium on the death penalty: the trend is growing". World Coalition. Retrieved 6 April 2023.
    10. ^ "DEATH PENALTY: NGOs, Italy Seek Worldwide Ban". IPS News. Archived from the original on 9 October 2006. Retrieved 20 January 2020. IPS, 2006

    External links

    • Moratoria: Death Penalty Worldwide Academic research database on the laws, practice, and statistics of capital punishment for every death penalty country in the world.
    • HandsOffCain.info – official website of Hands Off Cain
    • v
    • t
    • e
    UN System
    Charter
    Principal organs
    Funds, programmes,
    and other bodies
    Secretariat offices
    and departments
    Members
    and observersHistory
    Preceding years
    Preparatory years
    Activities
    ResolutionsElectionsRelated
    Other
    World portal
    • v
    • t
    • e
    Current judicial methods
    Ancient and
    Post-classical
    methods
    Related topics