Lurking doubt
Lurking doubt, also known as the Cooper test, is a legal test allowing an appeal court in England and Wales to overturn a conviction on the basis that it disagrees with the jury's verdict.
It was introduced in R v Cooper[1] by Judge Widgery. In that case, the appeal was based on mistaken identity rather than any irregularity, as all the issues were before a properly-instructed jury. In overturning the conviction in the Criminal Division of the Court of Appeal, the judge wrote:
... in cases of this kind the Court must in the end ask itself a subjective question, whether we are content to let the matter stand as it is, or whether there is not some lurking doubt in our minds which makes us wonder whether an injustice has been done.
Appeals on this principle are rarely successful[2] and some regard it as problematic.[3] It has been criticised as allowing the Court of Appeal to overturn juries: a later appeal court judgement says "it is not the function of this court to decide whether or not the jury was right in reaching its verdicts,"[4] while others argue that a more formal method for overturning juries' mistakes needs to be found.[5]
The test was reaffirmed in R v B:[6] "There can be no doubt that the lurking doubt notion ... continues to be a tool available to this court" and it can set aside convictions in the interests of justice.[7]
The phrase also occurs in commentary on derived legal systems, such as New Zealand[8] and Jersey.[9]
References
- ^ R v Cooper [1969] 1 All ER 32.
- ^ Roberts, Stephanie (2004). "The Royal Commission on Criminal Justice and Factual Innocence: Remedying Wrongful Convictions in the Court of Appeal". Justice Journal. 1 (2): 86. SSRN 1296555.
- ^ Ashworth, Andrew; Redmayne, Mike (10 June 2010). The Criminal Process. Oxford University Press. pp. 379–380. ISBN 978-0-19-954728-9.
- ^ R v Bamber [2002] EWCA Crim 2912, para 513
- ^ Criticism http://www.criminallawandjustice.co.uk/features/Lurking-Doubts-Remain
- ^ R v B [2005] EWCA Crim 63
- ^ Gillespie, Alisdair (18 April 2013). The English Legal System. Oxford University Press. p. 470. ISBN 978-0-19-965709-4.
- ^ Privy Council http://nzcriminallaw.blogspot.co.uk/2007/03/lurking-doubts.html
- ^ Jersey appeal reform "Jersey Law | Jersey Law Review | Criminal Appeal Law: Time for Change?". Archived from the original on 17 October 2014. Retrieved 17 October 2014.
- v
- t
- e
- Indictable
- Either way
- Summary
- Regulatory (lowered mens rea)
- Statutory
- Common law
- Actus reus
- Causation
- Mens rea
- Intention (criminal law)
- Intention in English law
- Recklessness
- Criminal negligence
- Corporate / Vicarious / Strict liability
- Omissions
- Lesser included offences
- Concurrence
- Ignorantia juris non excusat
- Self-defence
- Duress
- Necessity
- Loss of control
- Consent
- inc. participation in a sporting event
- Medical procedures
- Prevention of crime
- Lawful excuse
- Insanity
- Diminished responsibility
- Intoxication
- Category:Criminal defences
the person
- Homicide (Murder / Manslaughter / Corporate manslaughter / Infanticide)
- Unlawful killing
- Child destruction
- Concealment of birth
- Wounding or causing grievous bodily harm
- Assault occasioning actual bodily harm
- Common assault
- Attempting to choke, &c. in order to commit any indictable offence
- Assault with intent to rob
- Robbery
- Assault with intent to rape
- Assault with intent to resist lawful apprehension
- Assaulting a constable in the execution of his duty
- Battery
- Kidnapping
- Child abduction
- False imprisonment
- Harassment
- Offences Against the Person Act 1861
- Treason
- Riot
- Violent disorder
- Affray
- Unlawful assembly
- Fear or provocation of violence
- Harassment, alarm or distress
- Public Order Act 1986
- Incitement to ethnic or racial hatred
- Nuisance
- Causing Public nuisance
- Outraging public decency
- Effecting a public mischief
- Keeping a disorderly house
- Preventing the lawful burial of a body
- Breach of the peace
- Rout
- Forcible entry
- Accessory (legal term)
- Misconduct in a public office
- Misfeasance in public office
- Abuse of authority
- Perjury of oath
- Dereliction of duty
- Arson
- Dishonesty
- Cheating (law)
- Burglary
- Robbery
- Theft
- Criminal damage
- Squatting
- Trespass
- Taking without owner's consent
- Deception
- Handling stolen goods
- Misappropriation of funds
- Blackmail
- Extortion
- Cybercrime
- Theft Act 1968
- Theft Act 1978
- Fraud Act 2006
- Fraud by abuse of position
- Conspiracy to defraud
- Fare evasion
- Webcam blackmail
and cheating
- Bribery
- Perjury
- Perverting the course of justice
- Witness intimidation
- Witness tampering
- Misprision of treason
- Jury tampering
- Assault with intent to resist lawful apprehension
- Assaulting a constable in the execution of his duty
- Harboring a fugitive
- Encouraging or assisting a crime
- Escape from lawful custody
- Obstruction of justice
- Obstruction of a police officer
- Wasting police time
- Refusing to assist a constable
- Sedition
- Espionage
- Contempt of court
- Fabrication of false evidence
- Rescuing a prisoner
- Contract
- Tort
- Property
- Wills
- Trusts and estates
- Evidence
- Criminal procedure
- English law portal
- For obsolete aspects see History of English criminal law table