Bargmann's limit

In quantum mechanics, Bargmann's limit, named for Valentine Bargmann, provides an upper bound on the number N {\displaystyle N_{\ell }} of bound states with azimuthal quantum number {\displaystyle \ell } in a system with central potential V {\displaystyle V} . It takes the form

N < 1 2 + 1 2 m 2 0 r | V ( r ) | d r {\displaystyle N_{\ell }<{\frac {1}{2\ell +1}}{\frac {2m}{\hbar ^{2}}}\int _{0}^{\infty }r|V(r)|\,dr}

This limit is the best possible upper bound in such a way that for a given {\displaystyle \ell } , one can always construct a potential V {\displaystyle V_{\ell }} for which N {\displaystyle N_{\ell }} is arbitrarily close to this upper bound. Note that the Dirac delta function potential attains this limit. After the first proof of this inequality by Valentine Bargmann in 1953,[1] Julian Schwinger presented an alternative way of deriving it in 1961.[2]

Rigorous formulation and proof

Stated in a formal mathematical way, Bargmann's limit goes as follows. Let V : R 3 R : r V ( r ) {\displaystyle V:\mathbb {R} ^{3}\to \mathbb {R} :\mathbf {r} \mapsto V(r)} be a spherically symmetric potential, such that it is piecewise continuous in r {\displaystyle r} , V ( r ) = O ( 1 / r a ) {\displaystyle V(r)=O(1/r^{a})} for r 0 {\displaystyle r\to 0} and V ( r ) = O ( 1 / r b ) {\displaystyle V(r)=O(1/r^{b})} for r + {\displaystyle r\to +\infty } , where a ( 2 , + ) {\displaystyle a\in (2,+\infty )} and b ( , 2 ) {\displaystyle b\in (-\infty ,2)} . If

0 + r | V ( r ) | d r < + , {\displaystyle \int _{0}^{+\infty }r|V(r)|dr<+\infty ,}

then the number of bound states N {\displaystyle N_{\ell }} with azimuthal quantum number {\displaystyle \ell } for a particle of mass m {\displaystyle m} obeying the corresponding Schrödinger equation, is bounded from above by

N < 1 2 + 1 2 m 2 0 + r | V ( r ) | d r . {\displaystyle N_{\ell }<{\frac {1}{2\ell +1}}{\frac {2m}{\hbar ^{2}}}\int _{0}^{+\infty }r|V(r)|dr.}

Although the original proof by Valentine Bargmann is quite technical, the main idea follows from two general theorems on ordinary differential equations, the Sturm Oscillation Theorem and the Sturm-Picone Comparison Theorem. If we denote by u 0 {\displaystyle u_{0\ell }} the wave function subject to the given potential with total energy E = 0 {\displaystyle E=0} and azimuthal quantum number {\displaystyle \ell } , the Sturm Oscillation Theorem implies that N {\displaystyle N_{\ell }} equals the number of nodes of u 0 {\displaystyle u_{0\ell }} . From the Sturm-Picone Comparison Theorem, it follows that when subject to a stronger potential W {\displaystyle W} (i.e. W ( r ) V ( r ) {\displaystyle W(r)\leq V(r)} for all r R 0 + {\displaystyle r\in \mathbb {R} _{0}^{+}} ), the number of nodes either grows or remains the same. Thus, more specifically, we can replace the potential V {\displaystyle V} by | V | {\displaystyle -|V|} . For the corresponding wave function with total energy E = 0 {\displaystyle E=0} and azimuthal quantum number {\displaystyle \ell } , denoted by ϕ 0 {\displaystyle \phi _{0\ell }} , the radial Schrödinger equation becomes

d 2 d r 2 ϕ 0 ( r ) ( + 1 ) r 2 ϕ 0 ( r ) = W ( r ) ϕ 0 ( r ) , {\displaystyle {\frac {d^{2}}{dr^{2}}}\phi _{0\ell }(r)-{\frac {\ell (\ell +1)}{r^{2}}}\phi _{0\ell }(r)=-W(r)\phi _{0\ell }(r),}

with W = 2 m | V | / 2 {\displaystyle W=2m|V|/\hbar ^{2}} . By applying variation of parameters, one can obtain the following implicit solution

ϕ 0 ( r ) = r + 1 0 p G ( r , ρ ) ϕ 0 ( ρ ) W ( ρ ) d ρ , {\displaystyle \phi _{0\ell }(r)=r^{\ell +1}-\int _{0}^{p}G(r,\rho )\phi _{0\ell }(\rho )W(\rho )d\rho ,}

where G ( r , ρ ) {\displaystyle G(r,\rho )} is given by

G ( r , ρ ) = 1 2 + 1 [ r ( r ρ ) ρ ( ρ r ) ] . {\displaystyle G(r,\rho )={\frac {1}{2\ell +1}}\left[r{\bigg (}{\frac {r}{\rho }}{\bigg )}^{\ell }-\rho {\bigg (}{\frac {\rho }{r}}{\bigg )}^{\ell }\right].}

If we now denote all successive nodes of ϕ 0 {\displaystyle \phi _{0\ell }} by 0 = ν 1 < ν 2 < < ν N {\displaystyle 0=\nu _{1}<\nu _{2}<\dots <\nu _{N}} , one can show from the implicit solution above that for consecutive nodes ν i {\displaystyle \nu _{i}} and ν i + 1 {\displaystyle \nu _{i+1}}

2 m 2 ν i ν i + 1 r | V ( r ) | d r > 2 + 1. {\displaystyle {\frac {2m}{\hbar ^{2}}}\int _{\nu _{i}}^{\nu _{i+1}}r|V(r)|dr>2\ell +1.}

From this, we can conclude that

2 m 2 0 + r | V ( r ) | d r 2 m 2 0 ν N r | V ( r ) | d r > N ( 2 + 1 ) N ( 2 + 1 ) , {\displaystyle {\frac {2m}{\hbar ^{2}}}\int _{0}^{+\infty }r|V(r)|dr\geq {\frac {2m}{\hbar ^{2}}}\int _{0}^{\nu _{N}}r|V(r)|dr>N(2\ell +1)\geq N_{\ell }(2\ell +1),}

proving Bargmann's limit. Note that as the integral on the right is assumed to be finite, so must be N {\displaystyle N} and N {\displaystyle N_{\ell }} . Furthermore, for a given value of {\displaystyle \ell } , one can always construct a potential V {\displaystyle V_{\ell }} for which N {\displaystyle N_{\ell }} is arbitrarily close to Bargmann's limit. The idea to obtain such a potential, is to approximate Dirac delta function potentials, as these attain the limit exactly. An example of such a construction can be found in Bargmann's original paper.[1]

References

  1. ^ a b Bargmann, V. (1952). "On the Number of Bound States in a Central Field of Force". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 38 (11): 961–966. Bibcode:1952PNAS...38..961B. doi:10.1073/pnas.38.11.961. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 1063691. PMID 16589209.
  2. ^ Schwinger, J. (1961). "On the Bound States of a Given Potential". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 47 (1): 122–129. Bibcode:1961PNAS...47..122S. doi:10.1073/pnas.47.1.122. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 285255. PMID 16590804.